For returned type wrong parsed?

[Alfredo Torre]

Compile this piece of code and see log file and compare results:

WriteLn("a1... OK");
Set a1 = For(1, 2, Text(Real n) { SetOfReal(n) });
WriteLn("a2... good result but confusing ERROR text");
Set a2 = For(1, 2, Text(Real n) { Set SetOfReal(n) });
WriteLn("a2... BAD result NO error text");
Set a3 = For(1, 2, Text(Real n) { Set ss = SetOfReal(n) });

[Jorge]

there is also a related code

Text x = {Real a = 1.0}

[danirus]

I take this bug. Manu is so busy working a lot for a migration project.

[danirus]

This bug has been resolved.
Before update, as Jorge told us, you can try to execute code like:

Text x = { Real a = 1.0 }

But there are more fantastic examples:

Polyn p = { TimeSet ts = WD(3) }
Matrix m = { Polyn p = 1-B }

And more...

The problem was related with the number of sentences inside a declared local
scope. In all this cases we have only one sentence. All the times that we were
using only one sentence inside a local scope, and when this sentence was a
function declaration (a little bit complicated in a real code) or an assignment
sentence (more frequently used) the problem appeared.

Now, the Evaluation Engine ensures itself of this possibility to avoid it.