Differences between "snapshot" or "filed" graphics

[jimarin]

Hi,

TolBase version

CVS-Snapshot y2004m12d15

I can provide with gcf file I used for reproducing this bug as needed.

What I observe is:

(a) I create a time series with:

Text (GCFFile := "C:/Documents and
Settings/Administrador/Escritorio/presmarketing.gcf");

Serie A = SubSer(InvCh(CalInd(C, WD(1)), CalInd(W, Diario)) + InvCh(CalInd
(C, WD(1)+WD(2)), CalInd(W, Diario)), y2000, y2004);

(b) I do some handling on the file (push the house button and zoom the part of the
graph I want)

(c) I do save with the button "Take a photo of the graphic" into file "hola.gif" which
I can also provide you with as desired.

(d) I do take a copy of the graph with the button "Copiar al portapapeles".

(e) I paste the copied graph into PowerPoint

(f) I import from PowerPoint the hola.gif file.

(g) Here is the "thing", the "snapshot" graphic from (e) does not look the same of
the "filed" one from (f) in PowerPoint...the quality of (e) is much better than (f).

(h) Can I save the "hand" operations I have made into the gcf? How do I recover
them?

cheers,

jima

[rcsoto]

Hi.

The function that is used to obtain the image of the graph is the same one in both
cases:
to the clipboard:

.graph snap - format emf CLIPBOARD

to file:

set img [ image create photo ]
.graph snap $img
$img write $fileToSave

but when keeping to disc provides but quality.

We are investigating in like causing that the quality in both cases is maxima and
equal.